Scholz, the deceiver of pensioners
Update: 16/03/2008
Care Reform Higher power, higher contributions
The Bundestag has decided to increase the long-term care contributions: + 0.25% in addition. Pensioners have to pay that amount, so do not be distributed in 2008 + 1.1%, but 0.85%, in 2009, not 1.6% but 1.35% of this government as a gift for pensioners! So much more is below the calculation of an ongoing impoverishment, the summer / DGB also criticized significantly.
Why a Health Minister Ulla Schmidt is satisfied, showed the only clear if the limited view of certain and unscrupulous politicians see where it's always audacious, regardless of whether citizens can bear the tax burden, we saddle goes one better! So not quite understand is, when a certain newspaper asked : "Mr. Sommer, a stand-alone average earners in Germany are € 100 net of labor taxes and contributions from just left of € 47.80. What is wrong? "
Intolerable is that political groups are currently out of pure selfishness skip to disperse the people, in those who will condemn the elderly and those who demand solidarity. Is not it funny: we had a few months of the CDU heard of dominant culture, the decent Germans are good, but now that defining culture is really needed, where the connecting element is in demand as the dominant culture is again packed in the posterior drawer !
Also are reports of ftd more than questionable , the records contain, such as "It was politically only enforceable because it has never been a generation of pensioners was fine as of today, knowing that the distribution of wealth in the first approximation of the income and wealth distribution of the corresponds to the entire people. Who cites mean, who wants to manipulate the people into polemic and demagogic way!
__________
Post, 15.3.2008:
Elections are and you know the mood of the people changes after the terrible demands only very slowly. So actually begin to affect the merging parties SPD and CDU to many in the nation. It was decided by subjecting the formula to reduce the pensions, a pension increase to mid-2008 by
+1.1% In 2008
and
+1.6% In 2009
and ensure that unscrupulous politicians expect too much, your voice recognition and the next election!
Not the politicians say that life is for pensioners, in fact more expensive and increasingly unaffordable:
+5% In 2008
and
+4% In 2009
Estimation of these are orders of magnitude, because the Federal Statistical Office is refusing to carry out a household-specific inflation calculation.
It can be said to operate without agitation, that the retired about 3% per year is less in the pocket. Well the few pensioners who have savings enough! Bad for those who need the pure pension payments. If one just calculates how much each pensioner shall ultimately less over the years, who will be shocked:
Do you recognize the real problem? You start with 800 € pension and think, "not much, but I come on to make ends meet." Every year, almost hardly noticeable, you have less in my pocket, because lie just for retirees, inflation rates several times higher than the politically whitewashed figures of the Federal Statistical Office. If you are in the fifth year as a retired suddenly only € 700 to spend (rent, electricity, water, gas, telephone, television or radio - because you can not do anything that will be deducted have mercy), then you already know now it tight! Holidays, times go away, go with friends to the cafe, the theater, you can not afford.
As you come into the year 10, that is 73-75 years old (you might still about 10-15 more years to go), then you realize not to do it! Then you can not afford anything more, then you can perhaps no longer afford the medicine that you need for happy life! If you say in the situation is not, I will ask the state for help, then you will simply go basis, while next to you the well-paid employees just packed his suitcase for three weeks Caribbean.
Then you are in fact your pension in the basic run with the money the state distributes to the poor who, if you're lucky, an example of the initiative of the Regional organizations of the German Pension Fund and the Deutsche Bahn See Miners' pension insurance :
. The calculation is of course more difficult, as shown simplified here.
But you see, because the State of its duty of care does not discern, because the state no steps against it, that this people as a community of solidarity ever further apart, lives that these depraved CDU with such a gentleman Mißfelder , the old no hip will have to continue to condemn the elderly, the elderly can be vulnerable and just replaced the poor status, you become a pensioner in the drama, slipping into poverty. This alls Mißfelder preach then something about "because you see how important it is to make provisions," This ignoramus alls, egocentric and demagogues do not take into account that
- You are a pensioner or as 50 + people not 30 or 40 years have had time to adjust to the situation today - or who was held 30 years ago Notwenidigkeit, provision must be made private; recall, that was the time dirty than the same CDU yet "the pension is safe," billboard,
- today's transitional society are affected by the new philosophy of Old "must leave", are
- They got in today as 40 year old in the multi-job and just now have a small income from which nothing, nothing can save for retirement!
No, the policy, it should make no illusion, will not help, at least not talk today established parties CDU and SPD (the Gnadenlospartei FDP or the new young rich, not to the Greens). Only a few associations are mature for one, unfortunately, not with much emphasis: The SoVD therefore calls for the introduction of an inflation protection clause : "The massive welfare cuts, the Agenda 2010 was launched with, has worsened the situation of many people. Pension cuts, Hartz IV and the health care reforms, citizens have heavy financial burden. Wages, pensions and benefits continue to lose purchasing power because prices are rising and the VAT was increased ... We need an active welfare state that ensures a high degree of social justice, "a petition of two social organizations .
I hope, dear reader, that
- Now you realize what this really measly pension increase, it is not a question of the year, but the party is that it is a question of the system! And it aims to: "Old must move away"
- You try, as a younger reader to deal with the problem of the old and create solidarity, at least for the
- You as an older reader no longer keep quiet, keep quiet because the descent into poverty and hopelessness
- They participate in the petition; Please tell your friends, acquaintances, relatives continue, they may also participate.
I do not want more and more people think the last second of her life in: "It would have been better, it would have come sooner!"



![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_eukg_2.gif)
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.ag-edelmetalle.de/grafiken/gold-dollar-1-woche/172x114.png)




very well written, but even as a small note:
Who now really the idea is to travel even more. ... Well, which the evil wake up later than expected with respect to ALGII. For there will be bitterly punished who has increased reserves of any kind. On the subject of Riester pension this:
http://www.riesterrentenbetrug.de/index.html
and then is surprised that anyone seriously trust in the state, the policy is lost?
The annuity payment amount will not increase from 1.7.2008 by 1.1 percent but only by 0.85 percent. Reason, effective from that date care insurance increased by 0.25 percent .- You have shown with your review once again, have the prospects Sozialversicherungsrenter in our society. All parties represented in parliament, with the exception of the two PDS members, had decided the relevant laws (pension formula, etc.) or indirectly through abstentions consented, and they stressed this, there would be no alternative. Now, these parties have exactly the anti-pensioner coalition (SPD, CDU / CSU, FDP, Greens) to put up the question of whether the proposed mini-increase of pensions is reason enough to trust one of these parties, nor .-
In the last three years, the pensioner was not by pension adjustments to the year have moved almost one months rent lost. Speculated to be a mass of pensioners have memory loss?
Mr. Schindler, and I encourage you to write me an article from your own experience like too! Send to email. I publish.
[...] Pension so normal this development is so bad the conclusion. > It assumes scope for systemic problems, the> System-is simply suppressed. I wonder too long ago about the attitude that is brought in both parts of the article as well as large sections of the forum participants expressed. There are only seen (potential) risks everything new (except the next 4 inch screen of the flat panel) is condemned. With this attitude we should really all be linked to the grave in the field and chop stick. I also see no problem to increase the Lebenserwatrung of the people any more. Of course this does not work with the current pension system, but was the current pension system from the beginning doomed to failure inside. The problem then lies in the pension system and not on life expectancy. With the exact same argument can be made the way any type of medical treatment maggoty. If we take the medical care of the population would stop completely, then there would be no more pension problems, the unemployment figures would ruckzuck would back down and the Hinter-/Ver-bliebenen richer than before. So it's all (still alive) better! What I mean to say / show: the reasoning approach in the article by the full-worriers is simply totally wrong. Any improvement in living conditions has an impact on the environment and the society! We must ask ourselves why we want back to the Stone Age? (Since the homo sapiens was largely environmentally neutral, everything was pure organically grown, no environmental toxins, no pension problem, no unemployment ...). I will not go there. In this sense, UK (who would not mind to live healthy 120 years) [...]
Find their part well, only one is not mentioned. Why not pay an official with the gentlemen in the till? I will provide for them the answer. Our laws are made by Bamten, AND A Crow Hacks OF OTHERS NOT EYE OFF: As easy as that!
To our politicians: they all have only one goal in mind, as soon as possible TO THE LARGE TROUGH, who has made the way there for the rest of his life is provided.
Mr. Schmitz, I think the solution is not so simple: "Why not pay the gentlemen officers with a means in the till" -> that, as in the private sector, the tax break in AN and AG shares. The AG's shares would be paid in addition to state! That's why we want the change does not, another argument: officers may not strike. What do you mean when officials are likely to strike, which would then in Germany: French conditions. That does not Prussian thinking!
Thank you for your reply. But you must again-speak, for every problem there is a solution. Why it works in other countries and not with us? The official is not allowed to strike me is quite clear, but it is not an answer to my question why do not they pay into the system! What use to me because preusisches thinking? It's only a matter of time go out to Germany in the lights!
Mr. Schmitz "no answer to my question why do not they pay into the system" -> There are of course there a solution for everything! Which I wirderspreche at all. Only you believe surely not himself, that the federal government officials will agree to such cherry picking. I mean, when solutions should already be realistic.
[...] * Truths can grow. I put people fleas, so to speak into his ear. * Finally, there is no such thing as truth or lies in the absolute sense. Every truth is valid only for a moment, [...]